lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201206111557.570807631@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Sun,  6 Dec 2020 12:17:31 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@...il.com>,
        Pete Heist <pete@...stp.net>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.9 23/46] inet_ecn: Fix endianness of checksum update when setting ECT(1)

From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 2867e1eac61016f59b3d730e3f7aa488e186e917 ]

When adding support for propagating ECT(1) marking in IP headers it seems I
suffered from endianness-confusion in the checksum update calculation: In
fact the ECN field is in the *lower* bits of the first 16-bit word of the
IP header when calculating in network byte order. This means that the
addition performed to update the checksum field was wrong; let's fix that.

Fixes: b723748750ec ("tunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040")
Reported-by: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@...il.com>
Tested-by: Pete Heist <pete@...stp.net>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201130183705.17540-1-toke@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/inet_ecn.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/net/inet_ecn.h
+++ b/include/net/inet_ecn.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline int IP_ECN_set_ect1(struct
 	if ((iph->tos & INET_ECN_MASK) != INET_ECN_ECT_0)
 		return 0;
 
-	check += (__force u16)htons(0x100);
+	check += (__force u16)htons(0x1);
 
 	iph->check = (__force __sum16)(check + (check>=0xFFFF));
 	iph->tos ^= INET_ECN_MASK;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ