[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16d6fdae-74ac-774c-9193-130dcfc5bc6c@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 07:37:47 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...onical.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Kars Mulder <kerneldev@...smulder.nl>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, chenqiwu <chenqiwu@...omi.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NEEDS-REVIEW] [PATCH] do_exit(): panic() when double fault
detected
On 12/6/20 5:10 AM, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> Double fault detected in do_exit() is symptom of integrity
> compromised. For safety critical systems, it may be better to
> panic() in this case to minimize risk.
Does this fix a real problem that you have observed in practice?
Or, is this a general "hardening" which you think is a good practice?
What does this have to do specifically with safety critical systems?
The kernel generally tries to fix things up and keep running whenever
possible, if for no other reason than it helps debug problems. If that
is an undesirable property for your systems, then I think you have a
much bigger problem than faults during exit().
This option, "panic_on_double_fault", doesn't actually panic on all
double-faults, which means to me that it's dangerously named. There's
even an unprivileged selftest (tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigreturn.c)
which can cause double faults all day long.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists