| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 17:42:26 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org, tomas.winkler@...el.com,
cang@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs: Make UPIU trace easier differentiate among CDB, OSF, and TM
From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Transaction Specific Fields (TSF) in the UPIU package could be CDB
(SCSI/UFS Command Descriptor Block), OSF (Opcode Specific Field), and
TM I/O parameter (Task Management Input/Output Parameter). But, currently,
we take all of these as CDB in the UPIU trace. Thus makes user confuse
among CDB, OSF, and TM message. So fix it with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 9 +++++----
include/trace/events/ufs.h | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 29d7240a61bf..5b2219e44743 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -315,7 +315,8 @@ static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
{
struct utp_upiu_req *rq = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
- trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &rq->header, &rq->sc.cdb);
+ trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &rq->header, &rq->sc.cdb,
+ "CDB");
}
static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
@@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
rq_rsp = (struct utp_upiu_req *)hba->lrb[tag].ucd_rsp_ptr;
trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &rq_rsp->header,
- &rq_rsp->qr);
+ &rq_rsp->qr, "OSF");
}
static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
@@ -340,10 +341,10 @@ static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
if (!strcmp("tm_send", str))
trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &descp->req_header,
- &descp->input_param1);
+ &descp->input_param1, "TM_INPUT");
else
trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &descp->rsp_header,
- &descp->output_param1);
+ &descp->output_param1, "TM_OUTPUT");
}
static void ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ufs.h b/include/trace/events/ufs.h
index 0bd54a184391..68e8e97a9b47 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ufs.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ufs.h
@@ -295,15 +295,17 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_uic_command,
);
TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_upiu,
- TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, const char *str, void *hdr, void *tsf),
+ TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name, const char *str, void *hdr, void *tsf,
+ const char *tsf_type),
- TP_ARGS(dev_name, str, hdr, tsf),
+ TP_ARGS(dev_name, str, hdr, tsf, tsf_type),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__string(dev_name, dev_name)
__string(str, str)
__array(unsigned char, hdr, 12)
__array(unsigned char, tsf, 16)
+ __string(tsf_type, tsf_type)
),
TP_fast_assign(
@@ -311,12 +313,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ufshcd_upiu,
__assign_str(str, str);
memcpy(__entry->hdr, hdr, sizeof(__entry->hdr));
memcpy(__entry->tsf, tsf, sizeof(__entry->tsf));
+ __assign_str(tsf_type, tsf_type);
),
TP_printk(
- "%s: %s: HDR:%s, CDB:%s",
+ "%s: %s: HDR:%s, %s:%s",
__get_str(str), __get_str(dev_name),
__print_hex(__entry->hdr, sizeof(__entry->hdr)),
+ __get_str(tsf_type),
__print_hex(__entry->tsf, sizeof(__entry->tsf))
)
);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists