[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85e90d44-6577-c208-9732-c16d540e22a5@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:11:16 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...omium.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: Only call sock_from_file with CONFIG_NET
On 12/7/20 12:06 PM, Florent Revest wrote:
> This avoids
> ld: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o: in function `bpf_sock_from_file':
> bpf_trace.c:(.text+0xe23): undefined reference to `sock_from_file'
> When compiling a kernel with BPF and without NET.
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested
Thanks.
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 0cf0a6331482..29ec2b3b1cc4 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -1272,7 +1272,11 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_snprintf_btf_proto = {
>
> BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sock_from_file, struct file *, file)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET
> return (unsigned long) sock_from_file(file);
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> BTF_ID_LIST(bpf_sock_from_file_btf_ids)
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists