lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:26:10 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Wei Huang <whuang2@....com> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net, wei.huang2@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:20:55PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote: > In summary, this patch is fine if Punit already verified it. My only > concern is the list can potentially increase over the time, and we will > keep coming back to fix override_acpi_psd() function. Can the detection be done by looking at those _PSD things instead of comparing f/m/s? And, alternatively, what is this fixing? So what if some zen2 boxes have correct _PSD objects? Why do they need to ignore the override? Hmmm? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists