[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=-2zoc06EY4R9ZJ0M874bQv3NuT8a0q9=RoYeMMtnXVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:07:53 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Roman Li <Roman.Li@....com>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@....com>,
Daniel Kolesa <daniel@...aforge.org>,
Timothy Pearson <tpearson@...torengineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: make DRM_AMD_DC x86-only again
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:57 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:50 PM Christian König <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
> > Am 07.12.20 um 21:47 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:13 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > >>
> > >> As the DRM_AMD_DC_DCN3_0 code was x86-only and fails to build on
> > >> arm64, merging it into DRM_AMD_DC means that the top-level symbol
> > >> is now x86-only as well.
> > >>
> > >> Compilation fails on arm64 with clang-12 with
> > >>
> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn30/display_mode_vba_30.c:3641:6: error: stack frame size of 2416 bytes in function 'dml30_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > >> void dml30_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull(struct display_mode_lib *mode_lib)
> > >>
> > >> I tried to see if the stack usage can be reduced, but this is code
> > >> that is described as "This file is gcc-parsable HW gospel, coming
> > >> straight from HW engineers." and is written in a way that is inherently
> > >> nonportable and not meant to be understood by humans.
> > >>
> > >> There are probably no non-x86 users of this code, so simplify
> > >> the dependency list accordingly.
> > > + Daniel, Timothy
> > >
> > > Others contributed code to enable this on PPC64 and ARM64.
> > > Unfortunately, we don't have these platforms to test with within AMD.
> > > Does PPC64 have the same stack limitations as ARM64? Harry, Leo, can
> > > you take a look at fixing the stack usage?
> >
> > This reminds me that I wanted to reply on this.
> >
> > 2416 is even to much on x86 if you add -Werror :)
> >
> > So this needs to be fixed anyway.
>
> Right, looking at my latest randconfig logs, I see the same problem on x86
> builds with clang as well, though I'm not entirely sure which other
> configuration
> options are needed to trigger it.
>
> So my patch can be disregarded, but I agree this needs a better fix,
> either in clang or in the dcn driver.
If you could give https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/frame-larger-than
a spin again, I would appreciate any feedback.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists