[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207223307.GK20489@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:33:07 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
Cc: "konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux-intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux-intel.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@....com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] swiotlb: Adjust SWIOTBL bounce buffer size for SEV
guests.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:20:20PM +0000, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> It is more of an approximation of the earlier static adjustment which
> was 128M for <1G guests, 256M for 1G-4G guests and 512M for >4G
> guests.
Makes sense and it is better than nothing. Please put that explanation
over the 6% define.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists