[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207225023.GA990319@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:50:23 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: phy-stm32-usbphyc: move PLL
supplies to parent node
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:01:27 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> PLL block requires to be powered with 1v1 and 1v8 supplies to catch ENABLE
> signal.
> Currently, supplies are managed through phy_ops .power_on/off, and PLL
> activation/deactivation is managed through phy_ops .init/exit.
> The sequence of phy_ops .power_on/.phy_init, .power_off/.exit is USB
> drivers dependent.
> To ensure a good behavior of the PLL, supplies have to be managed at PLL
> activation/deactivation. That means the supplies need to be put in usbphyc
> parent node and not in phy children nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
> ---
> Note that even with bindings change, it doesn't break the backward
> compatibility: old device trees are still compatible, USB is still
> functional. Device trees will be updated with this new bindings
> when approved.
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/phy-stm32-usbphyc.yaml | 22 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists