[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e15f4980654717f52733c56c33a3bdd@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 08:24:54 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] mm,madvise: call soft_offline_page() without
MF_COUNT_INCREASED
On 2020-12-07 03:34, HORIGUCHI NAOYA wrote:
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index 869ece2a1de2..ba861169c9ae 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -1269,6 +1269,12 @@ static int memory_failure_dev_pagemap(unsigned
>> long pfn, int flags,
>> if (!cookie)
>> goto out;
>>
>> + if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
>> + /*
>> + * Drop the extra refcount in case we come from madvise().
>> + */
>> + put_page(page);
>> +
>
> Should this if-block come before dax_lock_page() block?
Yeah, it should go first thing since as you noticed we kept the refcount
if we fail.
Saturday brain... I will fix it.
Thanks Naoya
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists