[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99008851-6c12-3acc-6530-25af08429ff5@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:39:25 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <monstr@...str.eu>,
<git@...inx.com>, Kalyani Akula <kalyani.akula@...inx.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Manish Narani <manish.narani@...inx.com>,
Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@...inx.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] arm64: dts: zynqmp: Add label for zynqmp_ipi
Hi,
On 06. 12. 20 23:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:06:05PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Add label which is used by bootloader for adding bootloader specific flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> ---
>>
>> U-Boot needs to add u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; property
>
> I'm not entirely sure what best practice rules are in this area, but
> shouldn't U-Boot locate the node by name instead of label ?
Labels are not listed in dt binding and there are two approaches how to
reference nodes. Via full path with node name or via labels.
I do normally use labels which are much simple.
And also if you take a look how dtb looks like (convert back to dts) you
can see that for example aliases are using full path (just &label) but
clocks/gic which is the part of <> is handled via phandles as numbers.
And labels names can vary and shouldn't be the part of binding doc as
far as I know. But I can be wrong of course.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists