[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c206865e-b2da-b996-3d48-2c71d7783fbc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:29:34 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: stsp <stsp2@...dex.ru>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM_SET_CPUID doesn't check supported bits (was Re: [PATCH 0/6]
KVM: x86: KVM_SET_SREGS.CR4 bug fixes and cleanup)
On 07/12/20 12:24, stsp wrote:
> It tries to enable VME among other things.
> qemu appears to disable VME by default,
> unless you do "-cpu host". So we have a situation where
> the host (which is qemu) doesn't have VME,
> and guest (dosemu) is trying to enable it.
> Now obviously KVM_SET_CPUID doesn't check anyting
> at all and returns success. That later turns
> into an invalid guest state.
>
>
> Question: should KVM_SET_CPUID check for
> supported bits, end return error if not everything
> is supported?
No, it is intentional. Most bits of CPUID are not ever checked by KVM,
so userspace is supposed to set values that makes sense or just copy the
value of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID more or less blindly.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists