[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207115953.GR3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:59:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] tick: Remove pointless cpu valid check in hotplug
code
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:12:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> void tick_handover_do_timer(void)
> {
> + if (tick_do_timer_cpu == smp_processor_id())
> + tick_do_timer_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
For the paranoid amongst us, would it make sense to add something like:
/*
* There must always be at least one online CPU.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists