linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 03/15] mm/hugetlb: Introduce a new config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 20:42:29 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 03/15] mm/hugetlb: Introduce a new
 config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:19 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 30.11.20 16:18, Muchun Song wrote:
> > The purpose of introducing HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP is to configure
> > whether to enable the feature of freeing unused vmemmap associated
> > with HugeTLB pages. And this is just for dependency check. Now only
> > support x86.
>
> x86 - i386 and x86-64? (I assume the latter only ;) )

Yeah, you are right. Only the latter support SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP.

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c |  2 +-
> >  fs/Kconfig            | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > index 0a45f062826e..0435bee2e172 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> > @@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ static struct kcore_list kcore_vsyscall;
> >
> >  static void __init register_page_bootmem_info(void)
> >  {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) || defined(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP)
> >       int i;
> >
>
> Why does this hunk belong into this patch? Looks like this should go
> into another patch.

Of course can. But Mike suggests that it is better to use it when
introducing a new config. Because this config depends on
HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE. And register_page_bootmem_info
is aimed to register bootmem info. So maybe it is reasonable from
this point of view. What is your opinion?

>
> >       for_each_online_node(i)
> > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> > index 976e8b9033c4..4961dd488444 100644
> > --- a/fs/Kconfig
> > +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> > @@ -245,6 +245,20 @@ config HUGETLBFS
> >  config HUGETLB_PAGE
> >       def_bool HUGETLBFS
> >
> > +config HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> > +     def_bool HUGETLB_PAGE
> > +     depends on X86
> > +     depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > +     depends on HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
> > +     help
> > +       When using HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP, the system can save up some
> > +       memory from pre-allocated HugeTLB pages when they are not used.
> > +       6 pages per 2MB HugeTLB page and 4094 per 1GB HugeTLB page.
>
> Calculations only apply to 4k base pages, no?

No, if the base page is not 4k, we also can free 6 pages.

For example:

If the base page size is 64k, the PMD huge page size is 512MB. We also
can free 6 pages(64k * 6) vmemmap. But maybe I should document this.

Thanks.

> (maybe generalize this a
> bit or mention 4k base pages - I'm pretty sure we'll see the "depends on
> X86" part fairly soon if this goes upstream)

Yeah, it can be easy to adapt to different architectures. :)

>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>


-- 
Yours,
Muchun