[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207124749.GH2352378@localhost>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:47:49 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/8] ntp: Make the RTC synchronization more reliable
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:46:18PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Switch it to an hrtimer instead which schedules the actual update work. The
> hrtimer will expire precisely (max 1 jiffie delay when high resolution
> timers are not available). The actual scheduling delay of the work is the
> same as before.
It works well in my tests.
> This becomes now:
>
> if (ntp_synced() && !hrtimer_is_queued(&sync_hrtimer))
> queue_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &sync_work, 0);
>
> which is racy when the hrtimer has expired and the work is currently
> executed and has not yet managed to rearm the hrtimer.
>
> Not a big problem as it just schedules work for nothing.
No more unexpected updates of the RTC observed.
Tested-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Thanks,
--
Miroslav Lichvar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists