[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478032.1607347219@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:20:19 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iov_iter] 9bd0e337c6: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.8% regression
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
> > Out of interest, would it be possible for you to run this on the tail of the
> > series on the same hardware?
>
> sorry for late. below is the result adding the tail of the series:
> * ded69a6991fe0 (linux-review/David-Howells/RFC-iov_iter-Switch-to-using-an-ops-table/20201121-222344) iov_iter: Remove iterate_all_kinds() and iterate_and_advance()
Thanks very much for doing that!
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists