linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 9/9] tasklets: Prevent kill/unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:00:40 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 9/9] tasklets: Prevent kill/unlock_wait deadlock on RT

On 2020-12-07 12:47:43 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:02:00PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > @@ -825,7 +848,20 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct
> >  
> >  	while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
> >  		do {
> > -			yield();
> >  		} while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
> >  	}
> >  	tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
> 
> 
> Egads... should we not start by doing something like this?

So we keep the RT part as-is and replace the non-RT bits with this?

Sebastian