[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f505b1f3-4117-ba0f-ef3a-e6ff5293205f@yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:29:02 +0300
From: stsp <stsp2@...dex.ru>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM_SET_CPUID doesn't check supported bits (was Re: [PATCH 0/6]
KVM: x86: KVM_SET_SREGS.CR4 bug fixes and cleanup)
07.12.2020 17:09, Paolo Bonzini пишет:
>
>
> Il lun 7 dic 2020, 15:04 stsp <stsp2@...dex.ru
> <mailto:stsp2@...dex.ru>> ha scritto:
>
> Perhaps it would be good if guest cpuid to
> have a default values of KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID,
> so that the user doesn't have to do the needless
> calls to just copy host features to guest cpuid.
>
>
> It is too late to change that aspect of the API, unfortunately. We
> don't know how various userspaces would behave.
Which means some sensible behaviour
already exists if I don't call KVM_SET_CPUID2.
So what is it, #UD on CPUID?
Would be good to have that documented.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists