linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: cdev: Flag invalid GPIOs as used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d00047a5727a8f26d3aa4c54892cc58@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 07 Dec 2020 14:59:18 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: cdev: Flag invalid GPIOs as used

On 2020-12-07 14:16, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:47:36PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When reporting the state of a GPIO to userspace, we never check
>> for the actual validity of the line, meaning we report invalid
>> lines as being usable. A subsequent request will fail though,
>> which is an inconsistent behaviour from a userspace perspective.
>> 
>> Instead, let's check for the validity of the line and report it
>> as used if it is invalid. This allows a tool such as gpioinfo
>> to report something sensible:
>> 
>> gpiochip3 - 4 lines:
>> 	line   0:      unnamed       unused   input  active-high
>> 	line   1:      unnamed       kernel   input  active-high [used]
>> 	line   2:      unnamed       kernel   input  active-high [used]
>> 	line   3:      unnamed       unused   input  active-high
>> 
>> In this example, lines 1 and 2 are invalid, and cannot be used by
>> userspace.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
>> index e9faeaf65d14..a0fcb4ccaa02 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
>> @@ -1910,6 +1910,7 @@ static void gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(struct 
>> gpio_desc *desc,
>>  	    test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags) ||
>>  	    test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags) ||
>>  	    test_bit(FLAG_SYSFS, &desc->flags) ||
>> +	    !gpiochip_line_is_valid(gc, info->offset) ||
>>  	    !ok_for_pinctrl)
>>  		info->flags |= GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_USED;
> 
> So this is somewhat separate from the rest of the series in case it
> applies also to gpio chips with reserved ranges (e.g.
> "gpio-reserved-ranges" devicetree property). Are they currently 
> reported
> as available?

I don't have any HW that uses this, but gpiolib-of.c makes use of it to
expose the valid GPIO range. I expect these systems suffer from the same
issue.

> Looks like this will work well also for USB gpio controllers with 
> static
> muxing configured in EEPROM, especially as that is how we already 
> report
> pins reported as unavailable by pinctrl (i.e. ok_for_pinctrl).

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...