linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between query REQ and query RSP in query trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:21:26 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
Cc:     alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org, tomas.winkler@...el.com,
        cang@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between query REQ and
 query RSP in query trace

On Sun,  6 Dec 2020 17:42:24 +0100
Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com> wrote:

> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> 
> Currently, in the query completion trace print,  since we use
> hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr and didn't differentiate UPIU between
> request and response, thus header and transaction-specific field
> in UPIU printed by query trace are identical. This is not very
> practical. As below:
> 
> query_send: HDR:16 00 00 0e 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00, CDB:06 0e 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> query_complete: HDR:16 00 00 0e 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00, CDB:06 0e 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> For the failure analysis, we want to understand the real response
> reported by the UFS device, however, the current query trace tells
> us nothing. After this patch, the query trace on the query_send, and
> the above a pair of query_send and query_complete will be:
> 
> query_send: HDR:16 00 00 0e 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00, CDB:06 0e 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ufshcd_upiu: HDR:36 00 00 0e 00 81 00 00 00 00 00 00, CDB:06 0e 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index ceb562accc39..e10de94adb3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -321,9 +321,15 @@ static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
>  static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
>  		const char *str)
>  {
> -	struct utp_upiu_req *rq = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
> +	struct utp_upiu_req *rq_rsp;
> +

I would add:

	if (!trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled())
		return;

Why do the work if the trace point is not enabled?

-- Steve


> +	if (!strcmp("query_send", str))
> +		rq_rsp = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
> +	else
> +		rq_rsp = (struct utp_upiu_req *)hba->lrb[tag].ucd_rsp_ptr;
>  
> -	trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &rq->header, &rq->qr);
> +	trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str, &rq_rsp->header,
> +			  &rq_rsp->qr);
>  }
>  
>  static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,