[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201207154142.cwxhlv7cxor424rv@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:41:42 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic in z3fold
On 2020-12-07 16:21:20 [+0100], Vitaly Wool wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:34 PM Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, that made zero difference.
>
> Okay, I suggest that you submit the patch that changes read_lock() to
> write_lock() in __release_z3fold_page() and I'll ack it then.
> I would like to rewrite the code so that write_lock is not necessary
> there but I don't want to hold you back and it isn't likely that I'll
> complete this today.
Please with a
Fixes: 4a3ac9311dac3 ("mm/z3fold.c: add inter-page compaction")
tag.
> Best regards,
> Vitaly
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists