linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: dw: Fix error return code in dw_spi_bt1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 07 Dec 2020 17:22:09 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: dw: Fix error return code in dw_spi_bt1_probe()

On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:42:37 +0800, Zhang Changzhong wrote:
> Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
> case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: dw: Fix error return code in dw_spi_bt1_probe()
      commit: e748edd9841306908b4e02dddd0afd1aa1f8b973

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark