linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] tick: Remove pointless cpu valid check in hotplug code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871rg15x4h.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:44:46 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] tick: Remove pointless cpu valid check in hotplug code

On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 12:59, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:12:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>>  void tick_handover_do_timer(void)
>>  {
>> +	if (tick_do_timer_cpu == smp_processor_id())
>> +		tick_do_timer_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>
> For the paranoid amongst us, would it make sense to add something like:
>
> 	/*
> 	 * There must always be at least one online CPU.
> 	 */
> 	WARN_ON_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);

And add that to all places which look at online mask during hotplug.

If we really care we can add it somewhere central in the hotplug
code. If that ever triggers then the wreckaged tick duty is just
uninteresting.

Thanks,

        tglx