linux-kernel - [PATCH] ACPI: scan: Fix up _DEP-related terminology with supplier/consumer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6314382.p3e4rEhblS@kreacher>
Date:   Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:46:06 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Hans De Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: scan: Fix up _DEP-related terminology with supplier/consumer

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

The ACPI namespace scanning code uses the terms master/slave when
populating the list of _DEP dependencies, but that use has no
external exposures and is not mandated by nor associated with any
external specifications.

Change the language used through-out to supplier/consumer.

No functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
 
 struct acpi_dep_data {
 	struct list_head node;
-	acpi_handle master;
-	acpi_handle slave;
+	acpi_handle supplier;
+	acpi_handle consumer;
 };
 
 void acpi_scan_lock_acquire(void)
@@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void acpi_device_dep_initialize(s
 		if (!dep)
 			return;
 
-		dep->master = dep_devices.handles[i];
-		dep->slave  = adev->handle;
+		dep->supplier = dep_devices.handles[i];
+		dep->consumer  = adev->handle;
 		adev->dep_unmet++;
 
 		mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
@@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ void acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_hand
 
 	mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) {
-		if (dep->master == handle) {
-			acpi_bus_get_device(dep->slave, &adev);
+		if (dep->supplier == handle) {
+			acpi_bus_get_device(dep->consumer, &adev);
 			if (!adev)
 				continue;