[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201208102112.2f0dccf9@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:21:12 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: trace: fix event state structure name
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:19:14 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 14:47:46 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Artem,
> >
> > On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 14:21 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > The documentation refers to a non-existent 'struct synth_trace_state'
> > > structure. The correct name is 'struct synth_event_trace_state'.
> > >
> > > In other words, this patch is a mechanical substitution:
> > > s/synth_trace_state/synth_event_trace_state/g
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks for fixing this!
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
> >
>
> Jon,
>
> Can you take this patch?
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
This wasn't sent to me, of course, so I was about to go digging into the
archive...until I realized I could just feed this email to b4 and
everything just happens by magic. How did we ever get by before b4?
Anyway...applied :)
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists