linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800
From:   Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS)
 support V3

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Ira,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out?
> 
> I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10
> sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
> 
> > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of.
> 
> It would be nice if people follow up on review request :)

I did, but just as an update to that patch.[1]  Sorry if this caused you to
miss the response.  It would have been better for me to ping you on that patch.
:-/

I was trying to avoid a whole new series just for that single commit message.
Is that generally ok?

Is that commit message still lacking?

Ira

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201124060956.1405768-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/