linux-kernel - Re: problem booting 5.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2012081935580.16458@hadrien>
Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:37:18 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        nicolas.palix@...v-grenoble-alpes.fr,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problem booting 5.10



On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:37 AM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> wrote:
> >
> > We have not succeeded to boot 5.10 on our Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @
> > 2.10GHz server.  Previous versions (eg 4.19 - 5.9) boot fine.  We have
> > tried various rcs.
>
> So the problem started with rc1?

Yes.

>
> Could you try bisecting - even partially?

Sure.

Thanks for the feedback.

julia

> If you do only six
> bisections, the number of suspect commits drops from 15k to about 230
> - which likely pinpoints the suspect area.
>
> That said, your traces certainly makes me go "Hmm. Some thing broke in
> SCSI device scanning", with the primary one being the
> wait_for_completion() one - the rest of the stuck processes seem to be
> stuck in async_synchronize_cookie_domain() and are presumably waiting
> for this kthread that is waiting for the scan to finish.
>
> So I'm adding SCSI people to the cc, just in case they go "Hmm..".
>
> Martin & co - in the next email Julia also quotes
>
> > [   51.355655][    T7] scsi 0:0:14:0: Direct-Access     ATA      ST2000LM015-2E81 SDM1 PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
> > Gave up waiting for root file system device.  Common problems:[..]
>
> which seems to be more of the same pattern with the SCSI scanning failure.
>
> Of course, it could be some non-scsi patch that causes this, but.. A
> bisect would hopefully clarify.
>
> Leaving the (simplified) backtrace quoted below.
>
>                    Linus
>
> >The backtrace for rc7 is shown below.
> >
> > [  253.207171][  T979] INFO: task kworker/u321:2:1278 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > [  253.224089][  T979]       Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-rc7 #3
> > [  253.239209][  T979] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> > [  253.256990][  T979] task:kworker/u321:2  state:D stack:    0 pid: 1278 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
> > [  253.275552][  T979] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> > [  253.290687][  T979] Call Trace:
> > [  253.302491][  T979]  __schedule+0x31e/0x890
> > [  253.315353][  T979]  schedule+0x3c/0xa0
> > [  253.327688][  T979]  schedule_timeout+0x274/0x310
> > [  253.379283][  T979]  wait_for_completion+0x8a/0xf0
> > [  253.392327][  T979]  scsi_complete_async_scans+0x107/0x170
> > [  253.406115][  T979]  __scsi_add_device+0xf7/0x130
> > [  253.418974][  T979]  ata_scsi_scan_host+0x98/0x1c0
> > [  253.431948][  T979]  async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x160
> > [  253.444853][  T979]  process_one_work+0x24c/0x490
>