lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLxYmu7OYvDDMjL1RXnu8rApJDeNODrMHkw7LHbNXiYww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:30:35 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] reset: hisilicon: correct vendor prefix

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:16 PM Leizhen (ThunderTown)
<thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2020/12/8 7:08, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:42:34AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> >> The vendor prefix of "Hisilicon Limited" is "hisilicon", it is clearly
> >> stated in "vendor-prefixes.yaml".
> >
> > Yes, but you can't fix this as changing it breaks compability between
> > DTBs and kernels.
> >
> > hisi has to be documented and marked 'deprecated'.
>
> I searched, and this is the only place that uses the hisi prefix. Currently,
> YAML check will report warnings due to mismatch any of the regexes defined
> in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
>
> Is it not good to add hisi prefix to clear warnings?
> "^hisi,.*":
>   description: Hisilicon Limited, deprecated.
>
>
> By the way, Hi Rob:
> The license information in some YAML files is incorrect. Can you correct it in v5.11?
> For example:
> WARNING: DT binding documents should be licensed (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> #26: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ths.yaml:1:
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

No, I can't change them. I'm not the copyright holder. The ones that
are not dual licensed are most likely converted from the old text
bindings which were default GPL2.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ