[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffa28f1070749ab00635608262c25bad2f11a185.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:12:51 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>
CC: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Support ptracer-induced xstate
area expansion
> On Dec 3, 2020, at 14:00, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Have you confirmed that real ptrace users (gdb? does anything
> actually use this code?) can handle the huge buffers that will be
> needed?
Yes, we thought there is actual usage for this. We (cc'ing Markus) will
support it on GDB.
Thanks,
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists