[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fd0591ce84684448e3f7720321f0c90eb3dccba.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:30:28 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org, tomas.winkler@...el.com,
cang@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between query REQ and
query RSP in query trace
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 10:21 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > @@ -321,9 +321,15 @@ static void ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace(struct
> > ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
> > static void ufshcd_add_query_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> > unsigned int tag,
> > const char *str)
> > {
> > - struct utp_upiu_req *rq = hba->lrb[tag].ucd_req_ptr;
> > + struct utp_upiu_req *rq_rsp;
> > +
>
> I would add:
>
> if (!trace_ufshcd_upiu_enabled())
> return;
>
> Why do the work if the trace point is not enabled?
>
> -- Steve
Steve,
Thanks a lot, I will fix it in the next version.
Thanks,
Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists