[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANA3-0fHyriceUjbSLBJgUA6oddGTRBuP_PwAyWar8o9eSPoaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 22:58:48 +0100
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...omium.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: Only provide bpf_sock_from_file with CONFIG_NET
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:56 PM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 06:36:23PM +0100, Florent Revest wrote:
> > This moves the bpf_sock_from_file definition into net/core/filter.c
> > which only gets compiled with CONFIG_NET and also moves the helper proto
> > usage next to other tracing helpers that are conditional on CONFIG_NET.
> >
> > This avoids
> > ld: kernel/trace/bpf_trace.o: in function `bpf_sock_from_file':
> > bpf_trace.c:(.text+0xe23): undefined reference to `sock_from_file'
> > When compiling a kernel with BPF and without NET.
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists