[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0ViH90qvr63H4J5Qn0FMfV4r9CeTHurj3N2qO2f=Dq+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:18:13 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mauro Rossi <issor.oruam@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Roman Li <Roman.Li@....com>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@....com>,
Daniel Kolesa <daniel@...aforge.org>,
Timothy Pearson <tpearson@...torengineering.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: make DRM_AMD_DC x86-only again
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 7:21 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 6:26 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:28 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> > Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> Hmm...no warnings for me with that config on next-20201208:
> $ make LLVM=1 -j71 olddefconfig
> $ make LLVM=1 -j71
> ...
> $ clang --version
> clang version 12.0.0 (git@...hub.com:llvm/llvm-project.git
> 1c98f984105e552daa83ed8e92c61fba0e401410)
> (ie. near ToT LLVM)
>
> I see CONFIG_KASAN=y in the .config, so that's a recurring theme with
> clang; excessive stack usage. It does seem a shame to disable a
> driver for a bunch of archs just due to KASAN stack usage.
> $ grep KASAN=y 0x9077925C_defconfig
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KASAN=y
> CONFIG_KASAN=y
>
> Is there a different branch of a different tree that I should be
> testing on instead? Otherwise, can you send the object file?
I was on a slightly older linux-next, and the latest version contains
the patch "ubsan: enable for all*config builds" in linux-next,
which enables CONFIG_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL. It took me
an hour to figure out, but after turning that option off, the warning
is back.
I'll send you the object for reference in a private mail, it's kind
of large.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists