[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad83f03b-869d-44e1-5db9-d5e91a0c0da3@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 01:00:02 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
nsaenzjulienne@...e.de, f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com,
sbranden@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: bcm2835: Support apply function for atomic
configuration
Hi,
On 07.12.20 at 14:52, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>
> Given that the bcm2835 driver is quite trivial I would be happy to
> create a series that "fixes" the driver to round down and provide a
> prototype for pwm_round_nearest for you to test on pwm-ir-tx. A willing
> tester and a real use-case were the single two things that stopped me
> investing time here.
>
Should I send a v3 of the .apply() support for the bcm2835 driver before you start
such a rework? The v3 would contain the check against truncation of the period but
keep the round-closest strategy as it is.
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists