[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201208063423.GB4430@unreal>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:34:23 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] driver core: Add fwnode_init()
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:36:43PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:25:15AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:02:22PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > > There are multiple locations in the kernel where a struct fwnode_handle
> > > > > is initialized. Add fwnode_init() so that we have one way of
> > > > > initializing a fwnode_handle.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/acpi/property.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/base/swnode.c | 2 +-
> > > > > drivers/firmware/efi/efi-init.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > > include/linux/fwnode.h | 6 ++++++
> > > > > include/linux/of.h | 2 +-
> > > > > kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > In this series, I didn't find any extension of fwnode_init() to be it more
> > > > than simple assignment. This change looks to me like unnecessary churn and
> > > > obfuscation rather than improvement.
> > > >
> > > > "...ops = &...;" is pretty standard in the kernel to initialize ops
> > > > structures.
> > >
> > > Subsequent patches make fwnode_init() do more stuff.
> >
> > But not in this series, right?
>
> In this series. The very next patch - Patch 8/17 :)
Thanks, sorry for the noise.
>
> -Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists