linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:02:20 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        ath10k <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rakesh Pillai <pillair@...eaurora.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF selection

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:23 PM Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> In some devices difference in chip-id should be enough to pick
> the right BDF. Add another support for chip-id based BDF selection.
> With this new option, ath10k supports 2 fallback options.
>
> The board name with chip-id as option looks as follows
> board name 'bus=snoc,qmi-board-id=ff,qmi-chip-id=320'
>
> Tested-on: WCN3990 hw1.0 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.2.2-00696-QCAHLSWMTPL-1
> Tested-on: QCA6174 HW3.2 WLAN.RM.4.4.1-00157-QCARMSWPZ-1
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <kuabhs@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Resurreted Patch V1 because as per discussion we do need two
> fallback board names and refactored ath10k_core_create_board_name.
>
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>