linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: compress: support chksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:31:15 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: compress: support chksum

On 2020/12/8 9:26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 12/08, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/12/8 4:37, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:32:09PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> +	if (!ret && fi->i_compress_flag & 1 << COMPRESS_CHKSUM) {
>>>
>>> This really could use some parentheses.  People shouldn't have to look up a
>>> C operator precedence table to understand the code.
>>
>> Will add parentheses to avoid misread.
>>
>>>
>>>> +		u32 provided = le32_to_cpu(dic->cbuf->chksum);
>>>> +		u32 calculated = f2fs_crc32(sbi, dic->cbuf->cdata, dic->clen);
>>>> +
>>>> +		if (provided != calculated) {
>>>> +			if (!is_inode_flag_set(dic->inode, FI_COMPRESS_CORRUPT)) {
>>>> +				set_inode_flag(dic->inode, FI_COMPRESS_CORRUPT);
>>>> +				printk_ratelimited(
>>>> +					"%sF2FS-fs (%s): checksum invalid, nid = %lu, %x vs %x",
>>>> +					KERN_INFO, sbi->sb->s_id, dic->inode->i_ino,
>>>> +					provided, calculated);
>>>> +			}
>>>> +			set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>>> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>>>
>>> WARN, WARN_ON_ONCE, BUG, BUG_ON, etc. are only for kernel bugs, not for invalid
>>> inputs from disk or userspace.
>>>
>>> There is already a log message printed just above, so it seems this WARN_ON_ONCE
>>> should just be removed.
>>
>> Jaegeuk wants to give WARN_ON and marking a FSCK flag without returning EFSCORRUPTED,
> 
> I think above printk_ratelimited should be enough.

Okay, so let me update the patch.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Jaegeuk, thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> - Eric
>>> .
>>>
> .
>