[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201208103112.2838119-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:31:08 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC lockdep 0/4] Fixes and self testcases for wait context detection
Hi Peter,
Recently I looked into the wait context check feature and found some
places could use fixes, besides a suite of test cases is also added to
verify these fixes and future development.
Note: I'm not 100% sure all the expected results of the test cases are
correct, please do have a look at the the comment of patch #4 in case I
miss something subtle.
Suggestion and comments are welcome!
Regards,
Boqun
Boqun Feng (4):
lockdep/selftest: Make HARDIRQ context threaded
lockdep: Allow wait context checking with empty ->held_locks
rcu/lockdep: Annotate the rcu_callback_map with proper wait contexts
lockdep/selftest: Add wait context selftests
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 +-
kernel/rcu/update.c | 8 +-
lib/locking-selftest.c | 233 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists