[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201208093701.3a890235@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:37:01 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Tianxianting <tian.xianting@....com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"juri.lelli@...hat.com" <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Print curr when RT throttling activated
Peter?
-- Steve
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:58:54 +0000
Tianxianting <tian.xianting@....com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> We met an issue that a normal thread can't get cpu,
> And at this moment, we found 'sched: RT throttling activated' log.
>
> So I think this patch is useful for such issue.
>
> Could I get more comments? Thanks in advance
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Rostedt [mailto:rostedt@...dmis.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2020 10:40 PM
> To: tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@....com>
> Cc: mingo@...hat.com; peterz@...radead.org; juri.lelli@...hat.com; vincent.guittot@...aro.org; dietmar.eggemann@....com; bsegall@...gle.com; mgorman@...e.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Print curr when RT throttling activated
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:51:29 +0800
> Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@....com> wrote:
>
> > We may meet the issue, that one RT thread occupied the cpu by
> > 950ms/1s, The RT thread maybe is a business thread or other unknown thread.
> >
> > Currently, it only outputs the print "sched: RT throttling activated"
> > when RT throttling happen. It is hard to know what is the RT thread,
> > For further analysis, we need add more prints.
> >
> > This patch is to print current RT task when RT throttling activated,
> > It help us to know what is the RT thread in the first time.
>
> I think this can be useful information to include.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@....com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/rt.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index
> > f215eea6a..8913f38cb 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static inline int rt_se_prio(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
> > return rt_task_of(rt_se)->prio;
> > }
> >
> > -static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> > +static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct
> > +task_struct *curr)
> > {
> > u64 runtime = sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq);
> >
> > @@ -970,7 +970,8 @@ static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> > */
> > if (likely(rt_b->rt_runtime)) {
> > rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
> > - printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated\n");
> > + printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated (curr: pid %d, comm %s)\n",
> > + curr->pid, curr->comm);
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * In case we did anyway, make it go away, @@ -1026,7 +1027,7 @@
> > static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq)
> > if (sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq) != RUNTIME_INF) {
> > raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
> > rt_rq->rt_time += delta_exec;
> > - if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq))
> > + if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq, curr))
> > resched_curr(rq);
> > raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists