linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Tegra210 audio graph card

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 20:18:21 +0530
From:   Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <sharadg@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] Tegra210 audio graph card

>>> No, this was sent by a b4 bug - notice the "no commit info" there, they
>>> weren't applied.
>> Oh I see! I guess review would be still pending then.
> I don't seem to have them in my backlog so either there was feedback
> from someone else I was expecting to see addressed or some other issue.

I am pretty sure that it is not because of any outstanding comments, 
because I got none on v6 and previous v5 feedback was taken care. May be 
this is because of the doc dependency I listed in the cover letter?

[Sorry I had to resend this reply. I accidentally replied from my 
personal email earlier and many people/DLs were missing on that]