[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <194d5a3c2c0f99345454004eb81c08d94181b7d7.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:22:04 +0000
From: "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
To: "hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"zou_wei@...wei.com" <zou_wei@...wei.com>
CC: "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] platform/x86: ISST: Mark mmio_range_devid_0 and
mmio_range_devid_1 with static keyword
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 20:28 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c:23:24:
> warning: symbol 'mmio_range_devid_0' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c:28:24:
> warning: symbol 'mmio_range_devid_1' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
>
Yesterday I sent a patch "[PATCH v2 2/3] platform/x86: ISST: Allow
configurable offset range" to fix.
Thanks,
Srinivas
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
> a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c
> index 2906cfe..ff49025 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mmio.c
> @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ struct isst_mmio_range {
> int end;
> };
>
> -struct isst_mmio_range mmio_range_devid_0[] = {
> +static struct isst_mmio_range mmio_range_devid_0[] = {
> {0x04, 0x14},
> {0x20, 0xD0},
> };
>
> -struct isst_mmio_range mmio_range_devid_1[] = {
> +static struct isst_mmio_range mmio_range_devid_1[] = {
> {0x04, 0x14},
> {0x20, 0x11C},
> };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists