linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1607445035.2673.64.camel@suse.com>
Date:   Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:30:35 +0100
From:   Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more
 information from the governor

On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 17:25 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is based on the RFC posted a few days ago:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1817571.2o5Kk4Ohv2@kreacher/
> 
> The majority of the original cover letter still applies, so let me quote it
> here:
> [...]

Hello Rafael,

I'd like to test this patch, as I have concerns on how it performs against the
current intel_pstate passive + HWP + schedutil (which leaves HWP.REQ.DESIRED
untouched).

I'll get results within a week. Do you mind holding back the merge until then?


Thanks!
Giovanni Gherdovich