linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] Driver core: platform: Add devm_platform_get_irqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X9EYRNDXS1Xcy4iU@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 19:32:36 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc:     jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, lenb@...nel.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, tglx@...utronix.de, maz@...nel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@...wei.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, dwagner@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] Driver core: platform: Add
 devm_platform_get_irqs_affinity()

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 06:36:56PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> Drivers for multi-queue platform devices may also want managed interrupts
> for handling HW queue completion interrupts, so add support.

Why would a platform device want all of this?  Shouldn't such a device
be on a "real" bus instead?

What in-kernel driver needs this complexity?  I can't take new apis
without a real user in the tree, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h