[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201209024415.GA33948@xiangao.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:44:15 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
To: Huang Jianan <huangjianan@...o.com>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, guoweichao@...o.com,
zhangshiming@...o.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] erofs: avoiding using generic_block_bmap
Hi Jianan and Chao,
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:34:54AM +0800, Huang Jianan wrote:
>
> 在 2020/12/8 21:11, Huang Jianan 写道:
...
> > -
> > static sector_t erofs_bmap(struct address_space *mapping, sector_t block)
> > {
> > struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> > + struct erofs_map_blocks map = {
> > + .m_la = blknr_to_addr(iblock),
>
> Sorry for my mistake, it should be:
>
> .m_la = blknr_to_addr(block),
>
Sigh, since my ro_fsstress doesn't cover bmap interface... I mean do we need
to add some testcase for this? (But it needs to be fixed anyway, plus this patch
looks good to me....)
Hi Chao,
could you kindly leave some free slot for this patch and
erofs: force inplace I/O under low memory scenario
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201208054600.16302-1-hsiangkao@aol.com
Since I'd like to merge these all for 5.11-rc1 (so we could have more time to
test until the next LTS version), since 5.10 is a LTS version, I tend to not
introduce any big modification (so in the past months, "erofs: force inplace
I/O under low memory scenario" never upstreamed at all.)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists