[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1im9bsn0a.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 22:02:35 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
SelvaKumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
damien.lemoal@....com, sagi@...mberg.me,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com, selvajove@...il.com,
nj.shetty@...sung.com, joshi.k@...sung.com,
javier.gonz@...sung.com,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] add simple copy support
Hannes,
[Sorry I'm late to the discussion here, had a few fires going in
addition to the end of the kernel cycle]
> And we shouldn't forget that the main issue which killed all previous
> implementations was a missing QoS guarantee.
That and the fact that our arbitrary stacking situation was hard to
resolve.
The QoS guarantee was somewhat addressed by Fred in T10. But I agree we
need some sort of toggle.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists