linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Virtual SPEC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:39:31 -0600
From:   Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
To:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        kyung.min.park@...el.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kim.phillips@....com,
        wei.huang2@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Virtual SPEC_CTRL feature



On 12/7/20 5:22 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:38 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Newer AMD processors have a feature to virtualize the use of the SPEC_CTRL
>> MSR. This feature is identified via CPUID 0x8000000A_EDX[20]. When present,
>> the SPEC_CTRL MSR is automatically virtualized and no longer requires
>> hypervisor intervention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> index dad350d42ecf..d649ac5ed7c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVIC               (15*32+13) /* Virtual Interrupt Controller */
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD    (15*32+15) /* Virtual VMSAVE VMLOAD */
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_VGIF               (15*32+16) /* Virtual GIF */
>> +#define X86_FEATURE_V_SPEC_CTRL                (15*32+20) /* Virtual SPEC_CTRL */
> 
> Shouldn't this bit be reported by KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID when it's
> enumerated on the host?

Jim, I am not sure if this needs to be reported by
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID. I dont see V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD or VGIF being reported
via KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID. Do you see the need for that?


>>  /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ECX), word 16 */
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512VBMI         (16*32+ 1) /* AVX512 Vector Bit Manipulation instructions*/
>>