[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03EC7F7D-DF6E-4962-BBA7-FA554509C2E5@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:14:07 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@...onical.com>,
"Xiao Ni" <xni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Revert "dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10"
> On Dec 9, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 4:58pm -0500,
> Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> wrote:
>
>> This reverts commit f0e90b6c663a7e3b4736cb318c6c7c589f152c28.
>>
>> Matthew Ruffell reported data corruption in raid10 due to the changes
>> in discard handling [1]. Revert these changes before we find a proper fix.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1907262/
>> Cc: Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@...onical.com>
>> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>
> If you're reverting all the MD code that enabled this DM change, then
> obviously the DM change must be reverted too. But please do _not_
> separate the DM revert from the MD reverts.
Good point! I should have thought about it through.
Thanks,
Song
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists