[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X9BBTr4uyb8wRtrP@sol.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:15:26 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix race of pending_pages in
decompression
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:34:06AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/12/9 7:55, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 12/07, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:51:45AM +0900, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > > > > I am trying to review this but it is very hard, as the f2fs compression code is
> > > > > very hard to understand.
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like a 'struct decompress_io_ctx' represents the work to decompress a
> > > > > particular cluster. Since the compressed data of the cluster can be read using
> > > > > multiple bios, there is a reference count of how many pages are remaining to be
> > > > > read before all the cluster's pages have been read and decompression can start.
> > > > >
> > > > > What I don't understand is why that reference counting needs to work differently
> > > > > depending on whether verity is enabled or not. Shouldn't it be exactly the
> > > > > same?
> > > > >
> > > > > There also seems to be some confusion about the scope of STEP_VERITY. Before
> > > > > f2fs compression was added, it was a per-bio thing. But now in a compressed
> > > > > file, it's really a per-cluster thing, since all decompressed pages in a
> > > > > compressed cluster are verified (or not verified) at once.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to, when a cluster needs both compression and
> > > > > verity, *not* set STEP_VERITY on the bios, but rather set a similar flag in the
> > > > > decompress_io_ctx?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Eric,
> > > >
> > > > Decompression and verity can be executed in different thread contexts
> > > > in different timing, so we need separate counts for each.
> > > >
> > > > We already use STEP_VERITY for non-compression case, so I think using
> > > > this flag in here looks more making sense.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > That didn't really answer my questions.
> > >
> > > I gave up trying to review this patch as the compression post-read handling is
> > > just way too weird and hard to understand. I wrote a patch to clean it all up
> > > instead, please take a look:
> > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201208060328.2237091-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
> >
> > Eric,
> > I also tried to review your patch, but it's quite hard to follow quickly and
>
> Me too, it needs more time to check whether the cleanup doesn't miss any cases.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > requires stress tests for a while. Given upcoming merge window and urgency of
> > the bug, let me apply Daeho's fix first. By any chance, may I ask revisiting
> > your clean-up on top of the fix in the next cycle?
> >
> > Thanks,
I'm not in a hurry, please just take a look when you have time.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists