linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device active mode only fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575B928898B319E8ACF1395FCCC0@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 07:40:28 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device active mode only
 fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1

> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> 
> According to the JEDEC UFS 3.1 Spec, If
> fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate
> is set to one, the device flushes the WriteBooster Buffer data automatically
> whenever the link enters the hibernate (HIBERN8) state. While the flushing
> operation is in progress, the device should be kept in Active power mode.
> Currently, we set this flag during the UFSHCD probe stage, but we didn't deal
> with its programming failure. Even this failure is less likely to occur, but
> still it is possible.
How about reading it on every ufshcd_wb_need_flush?

Thanks,
Avri