linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: compress: support chksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3e385d6-b473-c4c9-308d-0285bc71b5b0@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:31:20 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: compress: support chksum

On 2020/12/9 16:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 12/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/12/9 12:28, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2020/12/9 11:54, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> Ah, could you please write another patch to adjust the new changes?
>>>
>>> No problem, will drop "f2fs: compress:support chksum" based on your dev branch, and
>>> apply all compress related patches on top of dev branch.
>>
>> Jaegeuk, could you please
>> - drop "f2fs: compress:support chksum",
> 
> What I mean is keeping the old version in dev branch as is, since it gives
> another conflicts when dropping it. That can add another bug at this point.
> Can I get a separate patch to fix any issues in that original patch?

Oops...

Thanks,

> 
>> - manually fix conflict when applying "f2fs: add compress_mode mount option"
>> - and then apply last my resent patches.
>>
>> Thanks,
> .
>