[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJht_EMZqcPdE5n3Vp+jJa1sVk9+vbwd-Gbi8Xqy19bEdbNNuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 01:01:11 -0800
From: Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
To: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Cc: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux X25 <linux-x25@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 4/5] net/x25: fix restart request/confirm handling
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:36 PM Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de> wrote:
>
> We have to take the actual link state into account to handle
> restart requests/confirms well.
>
> @@ -214,8 +241,6 @@ void x25_link_established(struct x25_neigh *nb)
> {
> switch (nb->state) {
> case X25_LINK_STATE_0:
> - nb->state = X25_LINK_STATE_2;
> - break;
> case X25_LINK_STATE_1:
> x25_transmit_restart_request(nb);
> nb->state = X25_LINK_STATE_2;
What is the reason for this change? Originally only the connecting
side will transmit a Restart Request; the connected side will not and
will only wait for the Restart Request to come. Now both sides will
transmit Restart Requests at the same time. I think we should better
avoid collision situations like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists