[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtV8kG8MjfOZoVNGfLYgiRziG_YgeW+C6tKcUALj-xsJfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:27:54 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v7 04/15] mm/hugetlb: Introduce
nr_free_vmemmap_pages in the struct hstate
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:54 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 07.12.20 14:11, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:36 PM David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30.11.20 16:18, Muchun Song wrote:
> >>> Every HugeTLB has more than one struct page structure. The 2M HugeTLB
> >>> has 512 struct page structure and 1G HugeTLB has 4096 struct page
> >>> structures. We __know__ that we only use the first 4(HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
> >>> struct page structures to store metadata associated with each HugeTLB.
> >>>
> >>> There are a lot of struct page structures(8 page frames for 2MB HugeTLB
> >>> page and 4096 page frames for 1GB HugeTLB page) associated with each
> >>> HugeTLB page. For tail pages, the value of compound_head is the same.
> >>> So we can reuse first page of tail page structures. We map the virtual
> >>> addresses of the remaining pages of tail page structures to the first
> >>> tail page struct, and then free these page frames. Therefore, we need
> >>> to reserve two pages as vmemmap areas.
> >>>
> >>> So we introduce a new nr_free_vmemmap_pages field in the hstate to
> >>> indicate how many vmemmap pages associated with a HugeTLB page that we
> >>> can free to buddy system.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 3 ++
> >>> mm/Makefile | 1 +
> >>> mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++
> >>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h | 20 ++++++++
> >>> 5 files changed, 156 insertions(+)
> >>> create mode 100644 mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> >>> create mode 100644 mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> >>> index ebca2ef02212..4efeccb7192c 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> >>> @@ -492,6 +492,9 @@ struct hstate {
> >>> unsigned int nr_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> >>> unsigned int free_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> >>> unsigned int surplus_huge_pages_node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> >>> + unsigned int nr_free_vmemmap_pages;
> >>> +#endif
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
> >>> /* cgroup control files */
> >>> struct cftype cgroup_files_dfl[7];
> >>> diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile
> >>> index ed4b88fa0f5e..056801d8daae 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/mm/Makefile
> >>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FRONTSWAP) += frontswap.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_ZSWAP) += zswap.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_DMA) += dmapool.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlb.o
> >>> +obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP) += hugetlb_vmemmap.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += mempolicy.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) += sparse.o
> >>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) += sparse-vmemmap.o
> >>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> >>> index 1f3bf1710b66..25f9e8e9fc4a 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> >>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> >>> #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
> >>> #include <linux/page_owner.h>
> >>> #include "internal.h"
> >>> +#include "hugetlb_vmemmap.h"
> >>>
> >>> int hugetlb_max_hstate __read_mostly;
> >>> unsigned int default_hstate_idx;
> >>> @@ -3206,6 +3207,8 @@ void __init hugetlb_add_hstate(unsigned int order)
> >>> snprintf(h->name, HSTATE_NAME_LEN, "hugepages-%lukB",
> >>> huge_page_size(h)/1024);
> >>>
> >>> + hugetlb_vmemmap_init(h);
> >>> +
> >>> parsed_hstate = h;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..51152e258f39
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
> >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Copyright (c) 2020, Bytedance. All rights reserved.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Author: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> >>> + *
> >>> + * The struct page structures (page structs) are used to describe a physical
> >>> + * page frame. By default, there is a one-to-one mapping from a page frame to
> >>> + * it's corresponding page struct.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * The HugeTLB pages consist of multiple base page size pages and is supported
> >>> + * by many architectures. See hugetlbpage.rst in the Documentation directory
> >>> + * for more details. On the x86 architecture, HugeTLB pages of size 2MB and 1GB
> >>> + * are currently supported. Since the base page size on x86 is 4KB, a 2MB
> >>> + * HugeTLB page consists of 512 base pages and a 1GB HugeTLB page consists of
> >>> + * 4096 base pages. For each base page, there is a corresponding page struct.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Within the HugeTLB subsystem, only the first 4 page structs are used to
> >>> + * contain unique information about a HugeTLB page. HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER
> >>> + * provides this upper limit. The only 'useful' information in the remaining
> >>> + * page structs is the compound_head field, and this field is the same for all
> >>> + * tail pages.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * By removing redundant page structs for HugeTLB pages, memory can returned to
> >>> + * the buddy allocator for other uses.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * When the system boot up, every 2M HugeTLB has 512 struct page structs which
> >>> + * size is 8 pages(sizeof(struct page) * 512 / PAGE_SIZE).
> >>
> >>
> >> You should try to generalize all descriptions regarding differing base
> >> page sizes. E.g., arm64 supports 4k, 16k, and 64k base pages.
> >
> > Will do. Thanks.
> >
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Copyright (c) 2020, Bytedance. All rights reserved.
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Author: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> >>> + */
> >>> +#ifndef _LINUX_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_H
> >>> +#define _LINUX_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_H
> >>> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> >>> +void __init hugetlb_vmemmap_init(struct hstate *h);
> >>> +#else
> >>> +static inline void hugetlb_vmemmap_init(struct hstate *h)
> >>> +{
> >>> +}
> >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP */
> >>> +#endif /* _LINUX_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_H */
> >>>
> >>
> >> This patch as it stands is rather sub-optimal. I mean, all it does is
> >> add documentation and print what could be done.
> >>
> >> Can we instead introduce the basic infrastructure and enable it via this
> >> patch on top, where we glue all the pieces together? Or is there
> >> something I am missing?
> >
> > Maybe we can make the config of CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> > default n in the Kconfig. When everything is ready, then make it
> > default to y. Right?
>
> I think it can make sense to introduce the
> CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP option first if necessary for other
> patches. But I think the the documentation and the dummy call should
> rather be moved to the end of the series where you glue everything you
> introduced together and officially unlock the feature. Others might
> disagree :)
I see. Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> BTW, I'm planning on reviewing the other parts of this series, I'm just
> fairly busy, so it might take a while (I think we're targeting 5.12
> either way as the 5.11 merge window will start fairly soon).
>
Very thanks.
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
--
Yours,
Muchun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists